Association of magnesium intake with type 2 diabetes and. When pooling correlations, it is advised to perform fishers \z\transformation to. The i 2 value estimates the percentage of total variation across studies that is explained by true differences in the treatment effect rather than by chance, with a range from 0 to 100 %. Quantifying systematic heterogeneity in meta analysis view on github. Quantifying tumor vascular heterogeneity with dynamic.
In metaanalytic pooling, we aim to synthesize the effects of many different studies into one single effect. The evaluation of metaanalysis techniques for quantifying. M quantitatively describes systematic nonrandom heterogeneity patterns acting across multiple variants in a gwas meta analysis. Quantifying, displaying and accounting for heterogeneity in the meta analysis of rcts using standard and generalised q statistics. Jun 15, 2002 quantifying heterogeneity in a meta analysis. Ideally, the studies whose results are being combined in the meta analysis should all be undertaken in the same way and to the same experimental protocols. Higgins i2 is conventionally interpreted, in the sense of. Association between suicide reporting in the media and. Confidence intervals for the amount of heterogeneity in meta analysis. We develop measures of the impact of heterogeneity on a meta. The goal of a meta analysis is not simply to report the mean effect size, but also to report how the effect sizes in the various studies are dispersed. Outlines the role of meta analysis in the research process shows. Heterogeneity is usually assessed via the well known q and i2 statistics, along with the random effects estimate they imply.
In meta analytic pooling, we aim to synthesize the effects of many different studies into one single effect. The purpose of this present study was to quantify the level of true heterogeneity in the effect of vitamin e on pneumonia incidence using the i 2 statistic. We consider how best to quantify heterogeneity in the context of individual. By now, we have already shown you how to pool effect sizes in a metaanalysis. In recent years, alternative methods for quantifying heterogeneity have been proposed, that are based on a generalised q statistic. Heterogeneity assessment is unavoidable under metaanalysis as it guides the path to choose appropriate synthesizing method.
The evaluation of metaanalysis techniques for quantifying prescribed fire effects on fuel loadings introduction an observant hiker, naturalist, or outdoor enthusiast is bound to encounter tree tags, duff pins, or plot stakes in the forest owing to the large number of forest research. We consider how best to quantify heterogeneity in the context of individual participant data metaanalysis ipdma of binary data. Pdf which is the preferred measure of heterogeneity in. By now, we have already shown you how to pool effect sizes in a meta analysis. A simple prediction interval for randomeffects meta analysis higgins jpt, thompson sg, spiegelhalter dj mrc biostatistics unit, cambridge, uk for situations in which heterogeneity cannot be suitably explained by study characteristics, a randomeffects meta analysis is a common approach to synthesizing results from a collection of clinical trials. This extent may be measured by estimating a between. Quantifying the amount of heterogeneity in metaanalysis. This shift in thinking has been termed meta analytic thinking. Mar 01, 2017 the present work mainly aimed to appraise all existing methods and find the preferred measure of heterogeneity in meta analysis. However, the ability to predict the behaviour of a tumour in. Oct, 2012 18ffluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomographycomputed tomography 18ffdg petct is now routinely used in oncological imaging for diagnosis and staging and increasingly to determine early response to treatment, often employing semiquantitative measures of lesion activity such as the standardized uptake value suv. In addition, meta analysis is also useful for listing and possibly exploring sources of bias, quantifying betweenstudy heterogeneity, and proposing some potential explanations for dissecting genuine heterogeneity from bias. First, we sought to quantify the percentage of patients with depression who had a history of childhood maltreatment to gain an understanding of the.
However, the magnitude of heterogeneity differs across metaanalyses. We have developed a new quantity, i2, which we believe gives a better measure of the consistency between trials in a meta analysis. Performing a meta analysis of correlations is not too different from the methods we described before. Quantifying, displaying and accounting for heterogeneity in the meta. Draft please do not quote michael borenstein julian p. However, this makes only sense if we arent comparing apples and oranges. The extent of heterogeneity in a meta analysis partly determines the difficulty in drawing overall conclusions. Clinical researchers have often preferred to use a fixed effects model for the primary interpretation of a meta analysis. Another strategy for quantifying the true heterogeneity in a meta analysis consists of estimating the betweenstudies variance, 2. My own view is that any amount of heterogeneity is acceptable, providing both that the predefined eligibility criteria for the metaanalysis are sound and that the data are correct. Quantifying tumour heterogeneity in 18 ffdg petct imaging. These features have been demonstrated to be important for disease diagnosis, response assessment, and treatment planning. Overview one goal of a metaanalysis will often be to estimate the overall, or combined effect. Metaanalysis is a set of techniques used to combine the results of a number of different reports into one report to create a single, more precise estimate of an effect ferrer, 1998.
Quantifying the doseresponse of walking in reducing. In metaanalyses ma, effect estimates that are pooled together will often be. Some general points on the i2measure of heterogeneity in meta. Speci cally, network meta analysis produces posterior distributions identical to separate pairwise meta analyses for all treatment comparisons when a treatment. Clinical researchers have often preferred to use a fixed effects model for the primary interpretation of a metaanalysis. Meta analyses can better quantify the combined evidence of a werther effect across published studies, but these studies are scarce.
In meta analyses ma, effect estimates that are pooled together will often be heterogeneous. Metaanalysis leads to a shift of emphasis from single studies to multiple studies. Childhood maltreatment and characteristics of adult. Primary studies heterogeneity caused by betweenstudy differences is an expected circumstance. It is the univariate r 2 statistic, the ratio of the variance of the estimated treatment effect under the random and fixed effects models, that generalises most naturally, so this statistic provides our basis.
Figure 3 shows the studyspecific rrs and the pooled estimate. In statistics, study heterogeneity is a problem that can arise when attempting to undertake a meta analysis. Previously, four subgroups of the alphatocopherol, betacarotene cancer prevention atbc study of finnish male smokers aged 5069 years were identified in which vitamin e supplementation either significantly increased or decreased the risk of pneumonia. Demystifying fixed and random effects metaanalysis. My own view is that any amount of heterogeneity is acceptable, providing both that the predefined eligibility criteria for the meta analysis are sound and that the data are correct. Quantifying heterogeneity in individual participant data meta. Methodological standards for metaanalyses and qualitative. A likelihood approach to meta analysis with random effects. Heterogeneity is indicated by a chi2 statistic greater than the df degrees of freedom and a small p value eg p quantify heterogeneity. If all studies in an analysis shared the same true effect size, so that true heterogeneity is zero. This meta analysis aimed to quantify the doseresponse relationship between walking and chd risk reduction.
A test for the existence of heterogeneity exists, but depends on the number of studies in the meta analysis. Tumor microvasculature possesses a high degree of heterogeneity in its structure and function. It emphasizes the practical importance of the effect size instead of the statistical significance of individual studies. Weinstein november, 2015 abstract we develop and structurally estimate a model of heterogeneous multiproduct. Heterogeneity is usually assessed via the well known q and i 2 statistics, along with the random effects estimate they imply. The 18 meta analysis are then used to illustrate the relative performance of the standard and generalised q statistics in measuring the extent of heterogeneity present. Heterogeneity is an issue that is present in almost any metaanalysis. If all studies in the analysis were equally precise we could simply compute the mean of the effect sizes. We would not expect the observed effects to be identical to each other but because of withinstudy error, we would expect each to fall within some range of the common effect. Research article open access quantifying, displaying and. One meta analysis of 10 studies examined media reporting on deaths of celebrities by suicide and found an average increase of 2. Analyses in nutritional epidemiology usually assume a uniform effect of a nutrient. We describe what meta analysis is, what heterogeneity is, and how it affects meta analysis, effect size, the modeling techniques of meta analysis, and strengths and weaknesses of meta analysis. Although we expect high heterogeneity due to various design decisions that are described.
Pdf quantifying heterogeneity in individual participant data meta. Objectives to quantify the duration of each step of the diagnostic pathway for patients with multiple myeloma from symptom onset to confirmation of diagnosis. However, the ability to predict the behaviour of a tumour in terms of. We consider conventional i 2 and r 2 statistics estimated via a twostage approach and r 2 estimated via a onestage approach.
Quantifying the sources of firm heterogeneity colin hottman stephen j. The extent of heterogeneity in a metaanalysis partly determines the difficulty in drawing overall conclusions. And, the subsequent study showed the same effect, an odds ratio of 0. The question of how to quantify heterogeneity in the multivariate setting is therefore raised. The evaluation of meta analysis techniques for quantifying prescribed fire effects on fuel loadings introduction an observant hiker, naturalist, or outdoor enthusiast is bound to encounter tree tags, duff pins, or plot stakes in the forest owing to the large number of forest research. However, the test is susceptible to the number of trials included in the meta analysis. Abstract metaanalysis has developed to be a most important tool in evaluation research. Our meta analysis of logtransformed adiponectin levels and risk of type 2 diabetes included a total of studies 14 data points because results for men and women were reported separately for the hoorn study 22 including 14 598 participants and 2623 cases of type 2 diabetes.
An alternative quantification of heterogeneity in a meta analysis is the amongstudy variance often called. Data sources and selection criteria the medline and embase databases were searched up until january 2018 to identify articles that reported time intervals from onset of symptoms to. Quantifying the impact of betweenstudy heterogeneity in. Some general points on the measure of heterogeneity in meta. Prevalence of mycobacterium leprae in armadillos in brazil. Heterogeneity can manifest in two ways, with corresponding procedures. Meta analysis results for pain scores are summarized in table 4. Overview one goal of a meta analysis will often be to estimate the overall, or combined effect. Comparison of artifact correction with metaregression 348 sources of information about artifact values 349 how heterogeneity is assessed 349 reporting in psychometric metaanalysis 350 concluding remarks 351 summary points 351 part 9. This may include key patient characteristics, such as age and disease severity, methods for diagnosis and evaluation, followup, treatment doses and duration, and study design features, such as level of blinding. Assuming a randomeffects model, the be tweenstudies variance re ects how much the true population effect sizes estimated in the single studies of a meta analysis differ.
This book provides a clear and thorough introduction to metaanalysis, the process of synthesizing data from a series of separate studies. Hence i2 is percentage of the chisquared statistic which. Pdf which is the preferred measure of heterogeneity in meta. Quantifying, displaying and accounting for heterogeneity.
Quantifying systematic heterogeneity in metaanalysis. The evidence for the efficacy of walking in reducing the risk of and preventing coronary heart disease chd is not completely understood. From the standpoint that heterogeneity is inevitable in a meta analysis, we are left with the question of whether there is an acceptable degree of heterogeneity. Stratification for exploring heterogeneity in systematic. Pdf background in metaanalyses ma, effect estimates that are pooled together will often be heterogeneous. Chapter 6 betweenstudy heterogeneity doing metaanalysis in r. Hoffman, in biostatistics for medical and biomedical practitioners, 2015. Quantifying heterogeneity in individual participant data. In the literature, there are various measures of heterogeneity, such as, q statistic, h2 statistic, hm2 statistic, r2 statistic and i2 statistic. This is more useful for comparisons of heterogeneity among subgroups, but values depend on the treatment effect scale. Meta analyses often include small numbers of studies,6 8 and the power of the. Estimating and interpreting heterogeneity and summary effects.
May 21, 2002 a test for the existence of heterogeneity exists, but depends on the number of studies in the meta. Meta analysis has become a critically important tool in fields as diverse as medicine, pharmacology, epidemiology, education, psychology, business, and ecology. In this fictional example the five studies in the metaanalysis each showed precisely the same effect, an odds ratio of 0. Quantifying, displaying and accounting for heterogeneity in. In this respect, higgins i2 has emerged to be one of the most used and, potentially, one of the most. Interestingly, north american and european participants seemed to receive more benefits from magnesium intake than asians. Both two and onestage approaches are evaluated via simulation study. From the standpoint that heterogeneity is inevitable in a metaanalysis, we are left with the question of whether there is an acceptable degree of heterogeneity. The summary effect in the meta analysis is it follows an odds ratio of 0. Metaanalysis of observational studies in epidemiology. Assessing the amount of heterogeneity in random effects meta analysis. Its analysis is crucial for defining whether selected primary studies pooling is fit for metaanalysis. There are 3 types of heterogeneity commonly considered in meta analysis. Heterogeneity assessment is unavoidable under metaanalysis as it guides.
For example, it could be the case that while the overall effect we calculate in the meta. In order to get an approximate measure of heterogeneity, we also performed a meta analysis of the means for which we had cis or we could approximate online supplementary appendix a5, which resulted in an i 2 statistics of 98. Determining how substantial heterogeneity is is an important aspect of ma. Commonly, the generic inversevariance pooling method is also used to combine correlations from different studies into one pooled correlation estimate. This book provides a clear and thorough introduction to meta analysis, the process of synthesizing data from a series of separate studies. Study heterogeneity an overview sciencedirect topics. Jun 15, 2002 read quantifying heterogeneity in a meta.
We consider how best to quantify heterogeneity in the context of individual participant data meta analysis ipdma of binary data. Recent empirical evidence pinpointed what constitutes a large, average or small heterogeneity value for dichotomous outcomes. This extent may be measured by estimating a betweenstudy variance, but interpretation is then specific to a particular treatment effect metric. Fourth, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in which a cumulative meta analysis was performed to predict changes in the tendency of main risk estimates. Uncertainty in heterogeneity estimates in metaanalyses the bmj. Any type of quantitative data may be combined through meta analysis. This is a guide on how to conduct meta analyses in r. Introduction to metaanalysis borenstein, hedges, higgins. M an aggregate statistic, to identify systematic heterogeneity patterns and their direction of effect in meta analysis. Quantifying, displaying and accounting for heterogeneity in the metaanalysis of rcts using standard and generalised q statistics.
136 1083 574 582 1200 190 1503 1353 121 301 1628 466 1508 1561 129 1300 1208 1093 469 72 583 111 1134 688 131 212 1101 274 755 1306 1215 1478 807 574